TY - JOUR
T1 - A multi-sensor wearable system for the assessment of diseased gait in real-world conditions
AU - Salis, Francesca
AU - Bertuletti, Stefano
AU - Bonci, Tecla
AU - Caruso, Marco
AU - Scott, Kirsty
AU - Alcock, Lisa
AU - Buckley, Ellen
AU - Gazit, Eran
AU - Hansen, Clint
AU - Schwickert, Lars
AU - Aminian, Kamiar
AU - Becker, Clemens
AU - Brown, Philip
AU - Carsin, Anne-Elie
AU - Caulfield, Brian
AU - Chiari, Lorenzo
AU - D'Ascanio, Ilaria
AU - Del Din, Silvia
AU - Eskofier, Bjoern M.
AU - Garcia-Aymerich, Judith
AU - Hausdorff, Jeffrey M.
AU - Hume, Emily C.
AU - Kirk, Cameron
AU - Kluge, Felix
AU - Koch, Sarah
AU - Kuederle, Arne
AU - Maetzler, Walter
AU - Micó-Amigo, Encarna M.
AU - Mueller, Arne
AU - Neatrour, Isabel
AU - Paraschiv-Ionescu, Anisoara
AU - Palmerini, Luca
AU - Yarnall, Alison J.
AU - Rochester, Lynn
AU - Sharrack, Basil
AU - Singleton, David
AU - Vereijken, Beatrix
AU - Vogiatzis, Ioannis
AU - Della Croce, Ugo
AU - Mazzà, Claudia
AU - Cereatti, Andrea
AU - Mobilise-D consortium
N1 - Copyright © 2023 Salis, Bertuletti, Bonci, Caruso, Scott, Alcock, Buckley, Gazit, Hansen, Schwickert, Aminian, Becker, Brown, Carsin, Caulfield, Chiari, D’Ascanio, Del Din, Eskofier, Garcia-Aymerich, Hausdorff, Hume, Kirk, Kluge, Koch, Kuederle, Maetzler, Micó-Amigo, Mueller, Neatrour, Paraschiv-Ionescu, Palmerini, Yarnall, Rochester, Sharrack, Singleton, Vereijken, Vogiatzis, Della Croce, Mazzà and Cereatti and for the Mobilise-D consortium.
PY - 2023/4/21
Y1 - 2023/4/21
N2 - Introduction: Accurately assessing people's gait, especially in real-world conditions and in case of impaired mobility, is still a challenge due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors resulting in gait complexity. To improve the estimation of gait-related digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) in real-world scenarios, this study presents a wearable multi-sensor system (INDIP), integrating complementary sensing approaches (two plantar pressure insoles, three inertial units and two distance sensors). Methods: The INDIP technical validity was assessed against stereophotogrammetry during a laboratory experimental protocol comprising structured tests (including continuous curvilinear and rectilinear walking and steps) and a simulation of daily-life activities (including intermittent gait and short walking bouts). To evaluate its performance on various gait patterns, data were collected on 128 participants from seven cohorts: healthy young and older adults, patients with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and proximal femur fracture. Moreover, INDIP usability was evaluated by recording 2.5-h of real-world unsupervised activity. Results and discussion: Excellent absolute agreement (ICC >0.95) and very limited mean absolute errors were observed for all cohorts and digital mobility outcomes (cadence ≤0.61 steps/min, stride length ≤0.02 m, walking speed ≤0.02 m/s) in the structured tests. Larger, but limited, errors were observed during the daily-life simulation (cadence 2.72-4.87 steps/min, stride length 0.04-0.06 m, walking speed 0.03-0.05 m/s). Neither major technical nor usability issues were declared during the 2.5-h acquisitions. Therefore, the INDIP system can be considered a valid and feasible solution to collect reference data for analyzing gait in real-world conditions.
AB - Introduction: Accurately assessing people's gait, especially in real-world conditions and in case of impaired mobility, is still a challenge due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors resulting in gait complexity. To improve the estimation of gait-related digital mobility outcomes (DMOs) in real-world scenarios, this study presents a wearable multi-sensor system (INDIP), integrating complementary sensing approaches (two plantar pressure insoles, three inertial units and two distance sensors). Methods: The INDIP technical validity was assessed against stereophotogrammetry during a laboratory experimental protocol comprising structured tests (including continuous curvilinear and rectilinear walking and steps) and a simulation of daily-life activities (including intermittent gait and short walking bouts). To evaluate its performance on various gait patterns, data were collected on 128 participants from seven cohorts: healthy young and older adults, patients with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and proximal femur fracture. Moreover, INDIP usability was evaluated by recording 2.5-h of real-world unsupervised activity. Results and discussion: Excellent absolute agreement (ICC >0.95) and very limited mean absolute errors were observed for all cohorts and digital mobility outcomes (cadence ≤0.61 steps/min, stride length ≤0.02 m, walking speed ≤0.02 m/s) in the structured tests. Larger, but limited, errors were observed during the daily-life simulation (cadence 2.72-4.87 steps/min, stride length 0.04-0.06 m, walking speed 0.03-0.05 m/s). Neither major technical nor usability issues were declared during the 2.5-h acquisitions. Therefore, the INDIP system can be considered a valid and feasible solution to collect reference data for analyzing gait in real-world conditions.
U2 - 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1143248
DO - 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1143248
M3 - Article
C2 - 37214281
SN - 2296-4185
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
JF - Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
M1 - 1143248
ER -