A directed content analysis of viewpoints on the changing patterns of Lean Six Sigma research

Bryan Rodgers, Jiju Antony, Zhen He, Elizabeth A Cudney, Chad Laux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this paper, builds on previous studies that explored the research patterns over 15 years, is to consider the current status of the integration of Lean and Six Sigma. More specifically, this research addresses whether Lean and Six Sigma are stronger together and explores the reasons why Lean researchers and practitioners may be less likely to integrate Six Sigma in their work.

Design/methodology/approach
The research utilises a survey of 25 established and respected academics and practitioners from 16 countries. The questionnaire is analysed using a direct content approach and coded in NVivo.

Findings
The findings suggest that challenges may lie in the perception and understanding of statistics as well as short-term rather than long-term focus on improvement. The findings also suggest that academics and practitioners believe that Lean Six Sigma has developed over time and will continue to develop and improve as a methodology rather than being replaced with a new methodology.

Research limitations/implications
The survey has a sample size of 25, albeit all respondents are established and very experienced practitioners and academics.

Practical implications
For organisations that are introducing or refreshing their continuous improvement initiatives, this research identifies some of the challenges and provides the opportunity to address them to maximise the opportunities for success and sustainability.

Originality/value
The value of this paper is that it further addresses the debate over the integration of Lean and Six Sigma for many organisations which still employ Lean alone, but beyond this it explores how they will continue to develop and whether they are a permanent edition to the quality management landscape or a transition to something else.
LanguageEnglish
Pages641-654
Number of pages14
JournalThe TQM Journal
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Lean Six Sigma
Content analysis
Six Sigma
Methodology
Design methodology
Sample size
Sustainability
Statistics
Continuous improvement
Questionnaire
Quality management

Keywords

  • Academics
  • Integration
  • Lean Six Sigma
  • Practitioners
  • Research patterns

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Rodgers, Bryan ; Antony, Jiju ; He, Zhen ; Cudney, Elizabeth A ; Laux, Chad. / A directed content analysis of viewpoints on the changing patterns of Lean Six Sigma research. In: The TQM Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 641-654.
@article{4ac2107030964c8fa36b7c83c6575bed,
title = "A directed content analysis of viewpoints on the changing patterns of Lean Six Sigma research",
abstract = "PurposeThe purpose of this paper, builds on previous studies that explored the research patterns over 15 years, is to consider the current status of the integration of Lean and Six Sigma. More specifically, this research addresses whether Lean and Six Sigma are stronger together and explores the reasons why Lean researchers and practitioners may be less likely to integrate Six Sigma in their work.Design/methodology/approachThe research utilises a survey of 25 established and respected academics and practitioners from 16 countries. The questionnaire is analysed using a direct content approach and coded in NVivo.FindingsThe findings suggest that challenges may lie in the perception and understanding of statistics as well as short-term rather than long-term focus on improvement. The findings also suggest that academics and practitioners believe that Lean Six Sigma has developed over time and will continue to develop and improve as a methodology rather than being replaced with a new methodology.Research limitations/implicationsThe survey has a sample size of 25, albeit all respondents are established and very experienced practitioners and academics.Practical implicationsFor organisations that are introducing or refreshing their continuous improvement initiatives, this research identifies some of the challenges and provides the opportunity to address them to maximise the opportunities for success and sustainability.Originality/valueThe value of this paper is that it further addresses the debate over the integration of Lean and Six Sigma for many organisations which still employ Lean alone, but beyond this it explores how they will continue to develop and whether they are a permanent edition to the quality management landscape or a transition to something else.",
keywords = "Academics, Integration, Lean Six Sigma, Practitioners, Research patterns",
author = "Bryan Rodgers and Jiju Antony and Zhen He and Cudney, {Elizabeth A} and Chad Laux",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1108/TQM-03-2019-0089",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "641--654",
journal = "The TQM Journal",
issn = "1754-2731",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "4",

}

A directed content analysis of viewpoints on the changing patterns of Lean Six Sigma research. / Rodgers, Bryan; Antony, Jiju; He, Zhen; Cudney, Elizabeth A; Laux, Chad.

In: The TQM Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4, 08.07.2019, p. 641-654.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A directed content analysis of viewpoints on the changing patterns of Lean Six Sigma research

AU - Rodgers, Bryan

AU - Antony, Jiju

AU - He, Zhen

AU - Cudney, Elizabeth A

AU - Laux, Chad

PY - 2019/7/8

Y1 - 2019/7/8

N2 - PurposeThe purpose of this paper, builds on previous studies that explored the research patterns over 15 years, is to consider the current status of the integration of Lean and Six Sigma. More specifically, this research addresses whether Lean and Six Sigma are stronger together and explores the reasons why Lean researchers and practitioners may be less likely to integrate Six Sigma in their work.Design/methodology/approachThe research utilises a survey of 25 established and respected academics and practitioners from 16 countries. The questionnaire is analysed using a direct content approach and coded in NVivo.FindingsThe findings suggest that challenges may lie in the perception and understanding of statistics as well as short-term rather than long-term focus on improvement. The findings also suggest that academics and practitioners believe that Lean Six Sigma has developed over time and will continue to develop and improve as a methodology rather than being replaced with a new methodology.Research limitations/implicationsThe survey has a sample size of 25, albeit all respondents are established and very experienced practitioners and academics.Practical implicationsFor organisations that are introducing or refreshing their continuous improvement initiatives, this research identifies some of the challenges and provides the opportunity to address them to maximise the opportunities for success and sustainability.Originality/valueThe value of this paper is that it further addresses the debate over the integration of Lean and Six Sigma for many organisations which still employ Lean alone, but beyond this it explores how they will continue to develop and whether they are a permanent edition to the quality management landscape or a transition to something else.

AB - PurposeThe purpose of this paper, builds on previous studies that explored the research patterns over 15 years, is to consider the current status of the integration of Lean and Six Sigma. More specifically, this research addresses whether Lean and Six Sigma are stronger together and explores the reasons why Lean researchers and practitioners may be less likely to integrate Six Sigma in their work.Design/methodology/approachThe research utilises a survey of 25 established and respected academics and practitioners from 16 countries. The questionnaire is analysed using a direct content approach and coded in NVivo.FindingsThe findings suggest that challenges may lie in the perception and understanding of statistics as well as short-term rather than long-term focus on improvement. The findings also suggest that academics and practitioners believe that Lean Six Sigma has developed over time and will continue to develop and improve as a methodology rather than being replaced with a new methodology.Research limitations/implicationsThe survey has a sample size of 25, albeit all respondents are established and very experienced practitioners and academics.Practical implicationsFor organisations that are introducing or refreshing their continuous improvement initiatives, this research identifies some of the challenges and provides the opportunity to address them to maximise the opportunities for success and sustainability.Originality/valueThe value of this paper is that it further addresses the debate over the integration of Lean and Six Sigma for many organisations which still employ Lean alone, but beyond this it explores how they will continue to develop and whether they are a permanent edition to the quality management landscape or a transition to something else.

KW - Academics

KW - Integration

KW - Lean Six Sigma

KW - Practitioners

KW - Research patterns

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067043461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/TQM-03-2019-0089

DO - 10.1108/TQM-03-2019-0089

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 641

EP - 654

JO - The TQM Journal

T2 - The TQM Journal

JF - The TQM Journal

SN - 1754-2731

IS - 4

ER -