A Directed Content Analysis of Viewpoints on the Changing Patterns of Lean Six Sigma Research

Bryan Rodgers, Jiju Antony, Zhen He, Elizabeth A Cudney, Chad Laux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This article builds on previous studies that explored the research patterns over 15 years, to consider the current status of the integration of Lean and Six Sigma. More specifically, this research addresses whether Lean and Six Sigma are stronger together and explores the reasons why Lean researchers and practitioners may be less likely to integrate Six Sigma in their work.

Methodology: The research utilises a survey of 25 established and respected academics and practitioners from 16 countries. The questionnaire is analysed using a direct content approach and coded in NVivo.

Findings: The findings suggest that challenges may lie in the perception and understanding of statistics as well as short term rather than long term focus on improvement. The findings also suggest that academics and practitioners believe that Lean Six Sigma has developed over time and will continue to develop and improve as a methodology rather than being replaced with a new methodology.Research Limitations: The survey has a sample size of 25, albeit all respondents are established and very experienced practitioners and academics.

Practical Implications: For organisations who are introducing or refreshing their continuous improvement initiatives, this research identifies some of the challenges and provides the opportunity to address them to maximise the opportunities for success and sustainability.

Originality: The value of this paper is that it further addresses the debate over the integration of Lean and Six Sigma for many organisations which still employ Lean alone, but beyond this it explores how they will continue to develop and whether they are a permanent edition to the quality management landscape or a transition to something else.
LanguageEnglish
JournalThe TQM Journal
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 6 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Lean Six Sigma
Content analysis
Six Sigma
Methodology
Continuous improvement
Questionnaire
Sample size
Quality management
Sustainability
Statistics

Keywords

  • Lean Six Sigma
  • Academics
  • Practitioners
  • Research Patterns
  • Integration

Cite this

@article{4ac2107030964c8fa36b7c83c6575bed,
title = "A Directed Content Analysis of Viewpoints on the Changing Patterns of Lean Six Sigma Research",
abstract = "Purpose: This article builds on previous studies that explored the research patterns over 15 years, to consider the current status of the integration of Lean and Six Sigma. More specifically, this research addresses whether Lean and Six Sigma are stronger together and explores the reasons why Lean researchers and practitioners may be less likely to integrate Six Sigma in their work.Methodology: The research utilises a survey of 25 established and respected academics and practitioners from 16 countries. The questionnaire is analysed using a direct content approach and coded in NVivo.Findings: The findings suggest that challenges may lie in the perception and understanding of statistics as well as short term rather than long term focus on improvement. The findings also suggest that academics and practitioners believe that Lean Six Sigma has developed over time and will continue to develop and improve as a methodology rather than being replaced with a new methodology.Research Limitations: The survey has a sample size of 25, albeit all respondents are established and very experienced practitioners and academics.Practical Implications: For organisations who are introducing or refreshing their continuous improvement initiatives, this research identifies some of the challenges and provides the opportunity to address them to maximise the opportunities for success and sustainability.Originality: The value of this paper is that it further addresses the debate over the integration of Lean and Six Sigma for many organisations which still employ Lean alone, but beyond this it explores how they will continue to develop and whether they are a permanent edition to the quality management landscape or a transition to something else.",
keywords = "Lean Six Sigma, Academics, Practitioners, Research Patterns, Integration",
author = "Bryan Rodgers and Jiju Antony and Zhen He and Cudney, {Elizabeth A} and Chad Laux",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "6",
language = "English",
journal = "The TQM Journal",
issn = "1754-2731",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",

}

A Directed Content Analysis of Viewpoints on the Changing Patterns of Lean Six Sigma Research. / Rodgers, Bryan; Antony, Jiju; He, Zhen; Cudney, Elizabeth A; Laux, Chad.

In: The TQM Journal, 06.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Directed Content Analysis of Viewpoints on the Changing Patterns of Lean Six Sigma Research

AU - Rodgers, Bryan

AU - Antony, Jiju

AU - He, Zhen

AU - Cudney, Elizabeth A

AU - Laux, Chad

PY - 2019/4/6

Y1 - 2019/4/6

N2 - Purpose: This article builds on previous studies that explored the research patterns over 15 years, to consider the current status of the integration of Lean and Six Sigma. More specifically, this research addresses whether Lean and Six Sigma are stronger together and explores the reasons why Lean researchers and practitioners may be less likely to integrate Six Sigma in their work.Methodology: The research utilises a survey of 25 established and respected academics and practitioners from 16 countries. The questionnaire is analysed using a direct content approach and coded in NVivo.Findings: The findings suggest that challenges may lie in the perception and understanding of statistics as well as short term rather than long term focus on improvement. The findings also suggest that academics and practitioners believe that Lean Six Sigma has developed over time and will continue to develop and improve as a methodology rather than being replaced with a new methodology.Research Limitations: The survey has a sample size of 25, albeit all respondents are established and very experienced practitioners and academics.Practical Implications: For organisations who are introducing or refreshing their continuous improvement initiatives, this research identifies some of the challenges and provides the opportunity to address them to maximise the opportunities for success and sustainability.Originality: The value of this paper is that it further addresses the debate over the integration of Lean and Six Sigma for many organisations which still employ Lean alone, but beyond this it explores how they will continue to develop and whether they are a permanent edition to the quality management landscape or a transition to something else.

AB - Purpose: This article builds on previous studies that explored the research patterns over 15 years, to consider the current status of the integration of Lean and Six Sigma. More specifically, this research addresses whether Lean and Six Sigma are stronger together and explores the reasons why Lean researchers and practitioners may be less likely to integrate Six Sigma in their work.Methodology: The research utilises a survey of 25 established and respected academics and practitioners from 16 countries. The questionnaire is analysed using a direct content approach and coded in NVivo.Findings: The findings suggest that challenges may lie in the perception and understanding of statistics as well as short term rather than long term focus on improvement. The findings also suggest that academics and practitioners believe that Lean Six Sigma has developed over time and will continue to develop and improve as a methodology rather than being replaced with a new methodology.Research Limitations: The survey has a sample size of 25, albeit all respondents are established and very experienced practitioners and academics.Practical Implications: For organisations who are introducing or refreshing their continuous improvement initiatives, this research identifies some of the challenges and provides the opportunity to address them to maximise the opportunities for success and sustainability.Originality: The value of this paper is that it further addresses the debate over the integration of Lean and Six Sigma for many organisations which still employ Lean alone, but beyond this it explores how they will continue to develop and whether they are a permanent edition to the quality management landscape or a transition to something else.

KW - Lean Six Sigma

KW - Academics

KW - Practitioners

KW - Research Patterns

KW - Integration

M3 - Article

JO - The TQM Journal

T2 - The TQM Journal

JF - The TQM Journal

SN - 1754-2731

ER -