A critical evaluation of the public sector improvement framework

Bryan Rodgers, Jiju Antony, Derek Penman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate the use of the public sector improvement framework (PSIF) across public sector agencies in Scotland and explore the research gaps and consequent questions which arise. It is considered that the national promotion of a methodology for public sector improvement, while entirely legitimate, deserves independent scrutiny. Design/methodology/approach: The assertions of purpose and effectiveness of PSIF made by both the Improvement Service and European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) have been critically examined and independent research which would support or challenge those assertions has been explored. Findings: There are significant research gaps in the published literature which raise considerations around not only the effective deployment of EFQM but also the requirement for PSIF. The question whether there is a requirement to adapt EFQM for the public sector is also raised. Research limitations/implications: This paper explores published academic research and does not reference any internal research undertaken by either the Improvement Service or EFQM. Practical implications: Practitioners who have implemented or are considering implementing PSIF should do so from an informed perspective and be aware of the apparent lack of published research and the significant gaps and questions raised through this paper. Originality/value: No published research on PSIF and its adaptation from the EFQM business model has been identified. Given the investment and impact of implementing PSIF organisation wide, it is considered extremely valuable to raise these questions for practitioners, as well as encourage the academic community in undertaking research in this area.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Early online date14 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Public sector
Evaluation
European Foundation for Quality Management
Service improvement
Academic research
Methodology
Design methodology
Scotland
Business model

Keywords

  • Continuous improvement
  • EFQM
  • Improvement frameworks
  • Public sector
  • Research gaps

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

@article{bbae6a676eff4b5eb4b96cefd86d9c6e,
title = "A critical evaluation of the public sector improvement framework",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate the use of the public sector improvement framework (PSIF) across public sector agencies in Scotland and explore the research gaps and consequent questions which arise. It is considered that the national promotion of a methodology for public sector improvement, while entirely legitimate, deserves independent scrutiny. Design/methodology/approach: The assertions of purpose and effectiveness of PSIF made by both the Improvement Service and European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) have been critically examined and independent research which would support or challenge those assertions has been explored. Findings: There are significant research gaps in the published literature which raise considerations around not only the effective deployment of EFQM but also the requirement for PSIF. The question whether there is a requirement to adapt EFQM for the public sector is also raised. Research limitations/implications: This paper explores published academic research and does not reference any internal research undertaken by either the Improvement Service or EFQM. Practical implications: Practitioners who have implemented or are considering implementing PSIF should do so from an informed perspective and be aware of the apparent lack of published research and the significant gaps and questions raised through this paper. Originality/value: No published research on PSIF and its adaptation from the EFQM business model has been identified. Given the investment and impact of implementing PSIF organisation wide, it is considered extremely valuable to raise these questions for practitioners, as well as encourage the academic community in undertaking research in this area.",
keywords = "Continuous improvement, EFQM, Improvement frameworks, Public sector, Research gaps",
author = "Bryan Rodgers and Jiju Antony and Derek Penman",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1108/IJLSS-11-2018-0128",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Lean Six Sigma",
issn = "2040-4166",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",

}

A critical evaluation of the public sector improvement framework. / Rodgers, Bryan; Antony, Jiju; Penman, Derek.

In: International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 14.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical evaluation of the public sector improvement framework

AU - Rodgers, Bryan

AU - Antony, Jiju

AU - Penman, Derek

PY - 2019/8/14

Y1 - 2019/8/14

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate the use of the public sector improvement framework (PSIF) across public sector agencies in Scotland and explore the research gaps and consequent questions which arise. It is considered that the national promotion of a methodology for public sector improvement, while entirely legitimate, deserves independent scrutiny. Design/methodology/approach: The assertions of purpose and effectiveness of PSIF made by both the Improvement Service and European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) have been critically examined and independent research which would support or challenge those assertions has been explored. Findings: There are significant research gaps in the published literature which raise considerations around not only the effective deployment of EFQM but also the requirement for PSIF. The question whether there is a requirement to adapt EFQM for the public sector is also raised. Research limitations/implications: This paper explores published academic research and does not reference any internal research undertaken by either the Improvement Service or EFQM. Practical implications: Practitioners who have implemented or are considering implementing PSIF should do so from an informed perspective and be aware of the apparent lack of published research and the significant gaps and questions raised through this paper. Originality/value: No published research on PSIF and its adaptation from the EFQM business model has been identified. Given the investment and impact of implementing PSIF organisation wide, it is considered extremely valuable to raise these questions for practitioners, as well as encourage the academic community in undertaking research in this area.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate the use of the public sector improvement framework (PSIF) across public sector agencies in Scotland and explore the research gaps and consequent questions which arise. It is considered that the national promotion of a methodology for public sector improvement, while entirely legitimate, deserves independent scrutiny. Design/methodology/approach: The assertions of purpose and effectiveness of PSIF made by both the Improvement Service and European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) have been critically examined and independent research which would support or challenge those assertions has been explored. Findings: There are significant research gaps in the published literature which raise considerations around not only the effective deployment of EFQM but also the requirement for PSIF. The question whether there is a requirement to adapt EFQM for the public sector is also raised. Research limitations/implications: This paper explores published academic research and does not reference any internal research undertaken by either the Improvement Service or EFQM. Practical implications: Practitioners who have implemented or are considering implementing PSIF should do so from an informed perspective and be aware of the apparent lack of published research and the significant gaps and questions raised through this paper. Originality/value: No published research on PSIF and its adaptation from the EFQM business model has been identified. Given the investment and impact of implementing PSIF organisation wide, it is considered extremely valuable to raise these questions for practitioners, as well as encourage the academic community in undertaking research in this area.

KW - Continuous improvement

KW - EFQM

KW - Improvement frameworks

KW - Public sector

KW - Research gaps

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071617745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJLSS-11-2018-0128

DO - 10.1108/IJLSS-11-2018-0128

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Lean Six Sigma

JF - International Journal of Lean Six Sigma

SN - 2040-4166

ER -