A cost and CO2 comparison of using trains and higher capacity trucks when UK FMCG companies collaborate

Andrew Palmer, Philip Mortimer, Philip Greening, Maja Piecyk, Pratyush Dadhich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Companies working in a collaboration are able to achieve higher vehicle capacity utilisation and reduced empty running, resulting in lower costs and improved sustainability through reduced emissions and congestion. Collaboration produces higher volumes of goods to be moved than individual companies which means that further efficiencies may be possible by relaxing the freight mode constraints and considering rail and higher capacity vehicles. This paper explains how real world data has been used in a model to quantify the economic and environmental benefits in the FMCG sector delivered through collaboration utilising road and rail freight modes. Data for one month was provided by 10 FMCG companies and included freight transport flows between depots and customers, inter depot movements, and supplier collections. Detailed road and rail costs and operating characteristics were obtained and, with the transport flows, applied to a network design model which was used to validate the company data sets. A strategy examining the potential use of alternative higher capacity vehicles and rail for the flows between nine regional consolidation centres showed cost and CO2 savings. Just under half the inter-regional flows benefited from double deck trailers, longer heavier vehicles for 30% of the flows and rail with different wagon configurations for the rest. In summary there was a 23% reduction in cost with 58% fewer road kilometres and a 46% reduction in CO2 emissions. The ability to backhaul the same mode of transport between most of the regional centres was one of the strengths of this strategy.
LanguageEnglish
Pages94-107
JournalTransportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Volume58
Early online date23 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Trucks
Rails
Costs
Industry
Light trailers
Consolidation
Sustainable development
Economics

Cite this

@article{8590abf8700e42f9990b09f061c11985,
title = "A cost and CO2 comparison of using trains and higher capacity trucks when UK FMCG companies collaborate",
abstract = "Companies working in a collaboration are able to achieve higher vehicle capacity utilisation and reduced empty running, resulting in lower costs and improved sustainability through reduced emissions and congestion. Collaboration produces higher volumes of goods to be moved than individual companies which means that further efficiencies may be possible by relaxing the freight mode constraints and considering rail and higher capacity vehicles. This paper explains how real world data has been used in a model to quantify the economic and environmental benefits in the FMCG sector delivered through collaboration utilising road and rail freight modes. Data for one month was provided by 10 FMCG companies and included freight transport flows between depots and customers, inter depot movements, and supplier collections. Detailed road and rail costs and operating characteristics were obtained and, with the transport flows, applied to a network design model which was used to validate the company data sets. A strategy examining the potential use of alternative higher capacity vehicles and rail for the flows between nine regional consolidation centres showed cost and CO2 savings. Just under half the inter-regional flows benefited from double deck trailers, longer heavier vehicles for 30{\%} of the flows and rail with different wagon configurations for the rest. In summary there was a 23{\%} reduction in cost with 58{\%} fewer road kilometres and a 46{\%} reduction in CO2 emissions. The ability to backhaul the same mode of transport between most of the regional centres was one of the strengths of this strategy.",
author = "Andrew Palmer and Philip Mortimer and Philip Greening and Maja Piecyk and Pratyush Dadhich",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.trd.2017.11.009",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "94--107",
journal = "Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment",
issn = "1361-9209",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

A cost and CO2 comparison of using trains and higher capacity trucks when UK FMCG companies collaborate. / Palmer, Andrew; Mortimer, Philip; Greening, Philip; Piecyk, Maja; Dadhich, Pratyush.

In: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 58, 01.2018, p. 94-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cost and CO2 comparison of using trains and higher capacity trucks when UK FMCG companies collaborate

AU - Palmer, Andrew

AU - Mortimer, Philip

AU - Greening, Philip

AU - Piecyk, Maja

AU - Dadhich, Pratyush

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Companies working in a collaboration are able to achieve higher vehicle capacity utilisation and reduced empty running, resulting in lower costs and improved sustainability through reduced emissions and congestion. Collaboration produces higher volumes of goods to be moved than individual companies which means that further efficiencies may be possible by relaxing the freight mode constraints and considering rail and higher capacity vehicles. This paper explains how real world data has been used in a model to quantify the economic and environmental benefits in the FMCG sector delivered through collaboration utilising road and rail freight modes. Data for one month was provided by 10 FMCG companies and included freight transport flows between depots and customers, inter depot movements, and supplier collections. Detailed road and rail costs and operating characteristics were obtained and, with the transport flows, applied to a network design model which was used to validate the company data sets. A strategy examining the potential use of alternative higher capacity vehicles and rail for the flows between nine regional consolidation centres showed cost and CO2 savings. Just under half the inter-regional flows benefited from double deck trailers, longer heavier vehicles for 30% of the flows and rail with different wagon configurations for the rest. In summary there was a 23% reduction in cost with 58% fewer road kilometres and a 46% reduction in CO2 emissions. The ability to backhaul the same mode of transport between most of the regional centres was one of the strengths of this strategy.

AB - Companies working in a collaboration are able to achieve higher vehicle capacity utilisation and reduced empty running, resulting in lower costs and improved sustainability through reduced emissions and congestion. Collaboration produces higher volumes of goods to be moved than individual companies which means that further efficiencies may be possible by relaxing the freight mode constraints and considering rail and higher capacity vehicles. This paper explains how real world data has been used in a model to quantify the economic and environmental benefits in the FMCG sector delivered through collaboration utilising road and rail freight modes. Data for one month was provided by 10 FMCG companies and included freight transport flows between depots and customers, inter depot movements, and supplier collections. Detailed road and rail costs and operating characteristics were obtained and, with the transport flows, applied to a network design model which was used to validate the company data sets. A strategy examining the potential use of alternative higher capacity vehicles and rail for the flows between nine regional consolidation centres showed cost and CO2 savings. Just under half the inter-regional flows benefited from double deck trailers, longer heavier vehicles for 30% of the flows and rail with different wagon configurations for the rest. In summary there was a 23% reduction in cost with 58% fewer road kilometres and a 46% reduction in CO2 emissions. The ability to backhaul the same mode of transport between most of the regional centres was one of the strengths of this strategy.

U2 - 10.1016/j.trd.2017.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.trd.2017.11.009

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 94

EP - 107

JO - Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

T2 - Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

JF - Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

SN - 1361-9209

ER -