Предикторы исследовательской продуктивности: эффективны ли тренинги для ученых?

Translated title of the contribution: Predictors of the research productivity: are trainings for scientists effective?

Kairat Moldashev, Sanat Kozhakhmet, A. Yenikeeva, Assylbek Nurgabdeshov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose – To study predictors of research productivity, including mediator and moderator variables.

Methodology – A model that consists of such variables as research self-efficacy research training and the knowledge sharing climate in an organization was developed and tested. Data was collected using questionnaires.

Originality/value – The paper contributes to an understanding of mediator and moderator factors in the relationship between human resource development practices and research productivity. The research is also of practical importance to administrators in the field of science.

Findings – The results of the study show that scientific training positively affects the productivity of scientists, but they are not enough to obtain a high positive effect. University administrations need to focus on improving the climate, where scientists freely share their knowledge.
Translated title of the contributionPredictors of the research productivity: are trainings for scientists effective?
Original languageRussian
Pages (from-to)122-132
Number of pages11
JournalCentral Asian Economic Review
Volume3
Issue number126
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • research productivity
  • research self-efficacy
  • knowledge sharing climate
  • development of science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of the research productivity: are trainings for scientists effective?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this